Gaurav Saini vs. State Of U. P.

LITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NO(s). 435 OF 2010 GAURAV SAINI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for stay) Date: 24/11/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Prakash Kumar Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K.L. Janjani,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Issue fresh notice upon the unserved respondents. Dasti service upon the unserved respondents is allowed, permitted to be served through standing counsel/nearest civil court or trial court with the specific direction to serve the notice upon the unserved respondent, who is petitioner before that court in the litigation, either through the learned Advocate appearing for such litigant or even by affixing the same at the address disclosed before that court in the petition filed by the present respondent, who could not be served by regular notice. If respondent is not Item No.32 -2-

found at the registered address and failed to disclose his correct address, in the matter which is pending before that Court, then that Court shall take appropriate steps, as per Code of Civil Procedure.

Served respondents may file counter affidavit before the next date.

List again on 20.1.2011.

(S.G. SHAH) REGISTRAR