Sunil Lazarus Anthony vs. Laxmi Choice Associates
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
9 Sept 2009
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.81 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23542/2009 (From the judgement and order dated 10/08/2009 in CWP No.3798/2007 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY) SUNIL LAZARES ANTHONY Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S LAXMI CHOICE ASSOCIATES & ORS. Respondent(s) (Office report for directions) Date: 27/07/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA (IN CHAMBERS) For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.R. Setia, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Akshat Kulshrestha, Adv. Ms.Pallavi Mohan, Adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh, Adv. Mr.Ram Lal Roy, Adv. Mr.Ramesh N.Keswani, Adv. Mrs.Rachana Joshi Issar, Adv. Ms.Ambreen Rasool, Adv. Ms.Nidhi Tewari, Adv. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai, Adv. Mr. Nirnimesh Dube, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the office report. The name of respondent No.109 be deleted from the array of parties at the risk of the petitioner. I.A.No.4 is accordingly allowed. Issue fresh notice to the unserved respondents, returnable within four weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
(Satish K.Yadav) (Sharda Kapoor) Court Master Court Master
®