Vanchiyil Sree Saravana Temple vs. Shaiju J
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 20531/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-06-2018 in OP(C) No. 843/2018 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam)
VANCHIYIL SREE SARAVANA TEMPLE & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SHAIJU J. & ANR. Respondent(s)
case.
Signature Not Verified
Date : 04-01-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Raghenth Basant, Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Prerna Acharya, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Kaushitaki Sharma, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR |
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. K.parameshwar, AOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Arti Gupta, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Kanti, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Chinmay Kalgaonkar, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
We have heard learned counsel for the parties and after hearing the arguments and perusing the impugned order, we find no reason to interfere with the same as it is only an order of remittal directing the Trial Court to go into the merits of the
In our view, the High Court rightly held that what has been sought for is in the nature of a direction to give effect to the scheme and not modification. However, we make it clear that we Digitally signed by SWETA BALODI Date: 2024.01.08 17:40:22 IST Reason:
have not gone through the merits of the case.
The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)