West Bengal Indusl. Devt. Corp vs. Tata Motors Ltd.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
13 Aug 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
$ ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR N.J.JAMADAR Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23843/2012 STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS TATA MOTORS LTD AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and prayer for interim relief and office report ) WITH SLP(C) NO. 24269 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 15/10/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Soumitra G Chaudhuri, Adv. Mr. Abhijit Sengupta,Adv. Ms Shagun Matta, Adv. Mr. Anip Sachthey, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Sonia Nigam, Adv, M/S. Karanjawala & Co.,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No. 23843/2012 and SLP(C) No. 24269/2012 the ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 seeks four weeks' time to file additional documents. In SLP(C) No. 24269/2012, notice issued to Respondent Nos. 3 and 5 returned unserved with the remarks "not mentioned department name hence not known" and "say the receiver incomplete name of department hence refused by L & L Reforms Department", respectively. -2- Item No.61 The ld. Advocate, Mr Soumitra G Chaudhuri appearing on behalf of Mr Abhijit Sengupta, Advocate-on-record states that he will file vakalatnama on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 and 5 during the course of the day. In respect of rest of the respondents in both the matters neither AD cards nor unserved envelopes have been received back. Await. In the meanwhile, additional documents may be filed. List again on 5.11.2012. | | |(N.J.JAMADAR) | | | |REGISTRAR |
hj