Satyapal Sharma vs. State Of Up
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble Manmohan
Stage:
DIRECTION MATTERS
Listed On:
28 Mar 2025
In:
Chamber
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
67693/2025,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.23
COURT NO.2
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 13970/2025
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-01-2020 in WC No. 329/2020 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad]
MANPREET & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(IA NO. 92365/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING, IA NO. 92362/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 92363/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T., IA No. 92361/2025 -PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..)
Date: 21-04-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Rishi Malhotra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prem Malhotra, AOR Ms. Ansuiya, Adv. Mr. Shivaansh Maini, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
$\mathbf{1}$ Permission to file special leave petition is granted.
Delay condoned. 2.
3. Issue notice.
ature Not Ver
Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
$5.$ In addition to the usual mode, liberty is granted to the petitioner to serve notice through the Standing Counsel for the respondent/State.
6. In the event the petitioners succeed, they would not be entitled to interest for the delayed period.
7. Tag with SLP(C) No. 13491 of 2023.
(DEEPAK SINGH) (ANJU KAPOOR) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR