Suraj Bhan vs. The State Of Haryana Collector
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| ( | Item No.66 | 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| REGISTRAR COURT. 2 | SECTION IVB | ||
| S U P R E M E C O U R T O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A | ||
| BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M K HANJURA | |||
| Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) | No(s).31388-31393/2014 | ||
| RAM AVTAR ETC ETC | Petitioner(s) | ||
| VERSUS | |||
| STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ETC ETC | Respondent(s) | ||
| WITH<br>SLP(C) No. 34697-34699/2014<br>(With Office Report) | |||
| SLP(C) No. 7221-7222/2015<br>(With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) | |||
| SLP(C) No. 36507-36508/2014<br>(With Office Report) | |||
| SLP(C) No. 934-941/2015<br>(With Office Report) | |||
| SLP(C) No. 7224-7225/2015<br>(With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and Office Report) | |||
| SLP(C) No. 14098/2015<br>(With Office Report) | |||
| Date : 10/08/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. | |||
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal,Adv.<br>Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg,Adv.<br>Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. | |||
| Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed by<br>Madhu Grover<br>Date: 2015.08.11 | Mr. Vikram Singh,Adv. | ||
| Reason: | 15:37:13 SCT | Mr. Apoorv Singhal,Adv.<br>Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv. | |
| Item No.66 | Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari,Adv.<br>2 | ||
| Mr. Abhinandan Banerjee,Adv. | |||
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv. Mr. Deepak Thukral,Adv.
Mr. Alok Sangwan,Adv.
Mr. Vishwapal Singh,Adv. Mr. Anurag Kumar,Adv.
Mr. Gautam Sharma,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv.
Mr. Vinod Sharma,Adv. Mr. Arun Singh,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) Nos. 31388-31393/2014
Mr. Deepak Thukral,Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the State of Haryana. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit.
Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondents shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served.
SLP(C) Nos. 34697-34699/2014
Mr. Deepak Thukral,Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the State of Haryana. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit.
Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondents shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. Item No.66 3
SLP(C) Nos. 36507-36508/2014
Mr. Deepak Thukral,Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the State of Haryana. He seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit.
Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.
SLP(C) Nos. 934-941,7221-7222,7224-7225 and 14098/2015 Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondents shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served. List again on 27.10.2015.
(M K HANJURA) Registrar
MG