Anand Agency vs. The Joint Director And Head Of Zone Cbi
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna, Hon'ble Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Stage:
FRESHLY / ADJOURNED MATTERS
Remarks:
Dismissed on ground of delay [and merits]
Listed On:
16 Oct 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.46
COURT NO.7
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diarv No. 25573/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-02-2022 in CRLOP No. 16441/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras)
M/S ANAND AGENCY
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE JOINT DIRECTOR AND HEAD OF ZONE CBI & ANR. Respondent $(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.161112/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.161111/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.161114/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS )
Date: 16-10-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. C.R.Jaya Sukin, Adv. Mr. Priva Rani, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Zongluju, Adv. Ms. Anshuman Verman, Adv. Ms. Parul Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Narender Kumar Verma, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Having heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner, we see no reason to entertain this petition on the ground of delay as well as on merits.
Signature Not Verified However, if any other remedy is open to the petitioner, tally signed by $\frac{1}{20.22 \times 10.17}$ The same may be availed in accordance with law. Any of the
$\mathbf{1}$
observations contained in the impugned order will not be an impediment to urge those contentions before the appropriate forum.
With the above observations, special leave petition stands disposed of.
Pending application(s),if any, shall also stand disposed of.