Seven City Developers Pvt. Ltd. Represented By Its Director vs. The State Of Meghalaya Department Of Revenue Represented By The Secretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:30 Nov 2017
CNR:SCIN010252942015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Stage:

SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)

Remarks:

Other [BEFORE HON. COURT]

Listed On:

30 Nov 2017

In:

Registrar

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

SECTION XIV

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SANJAY PARIHAR

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 28580/2015 SEVEN CITY DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s)

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA

Respondent(s)

(List only SC 15360/2017 before ld. registrar court for service <pre>compliance.)</pre>

WITH

$SLP(C)$ No. 15360/2017 (XIV)

Date : 30-11-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Adv. Mrs. B. Sunita Rao, AOR Mr. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, AOR Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, AOR Mr. Samir Ali Khan, AOR Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shukla, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

SLP(C) No. 28580/2015

The matter has already been directed to be listed before the *ble Court. Therefore, no further orders are required to be Ssed in it.

Item No.58 2

SLP(C) No. 15360/2017

The office report indicates that the Ld. Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 3,5 and 6 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

However, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shukla, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent No. 3. He has stated that he will file the vakalatnama during the course of the day and has also stated that he does not wish to file the counter affidavit. This is taken on record.

Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.4 to file the counter affidavit. After expiry of four weeks, list the matter before the Hon'ble Court.

SANJAY PARIHAR Registrar

MG

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(25) - 20 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 16 May 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 30 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(22) - 12 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 18 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 9 May 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 9 May 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 19 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 19 Oct 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 19 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 9 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 9 Aug 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 9 Aug 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 9 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 27 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 27 Apr 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 27 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 12 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 12 Feb 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 12 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 27 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 27 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 1 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 1 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 1 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view