Abdul Rashid Mir vs. Ridhi Sidhi Builttech Pvt. Ltd. And Ors Director

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:14 Jul 2014
CNR:SCIN010252112017

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.14 SECTION XV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 14408/2010

JAIPUR DEVT.AUTH. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

M/S RIDHI SIDHI BUILTTECH P.LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s) (Office Report on Default) WITH SLP(C) No. 14455/2010 (Office Report on Default) SLP(C) No. 14459/2010 (Office Report on Default) SLP(C) No. 14502/2010 (Office Report on Default) SLP(C) No. 16534/2012 (Office Report on Default) SLP(C) No. 17349/2012 (Office Report on Default) SLP(C) No. 19574/2012 (Office Report on Default) SLP(C) No. 19581/2012 (Office Report on Default) SLP(C) No. 19583/2012 (Office Report on Default) SLP(C) No. 19584/2012 (Office Report on Default) Date : 14/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. GOPALA GOWDA [IN CHAMBER] For Petitioner(s) Mr. Devendra Jha, Adv. Mr. S. K. Bhattacharya ,Adv. Mr. S.S. Shamshery, A.A.G. Signature Not Verified Mr. Milind Kumar ,Adv. Digitally signed by Sushil Kumar Rakheja Date: 2014.07.15 17:14:47 IST For Respondent(s) Reason: M/s. COAC ,Advs. 2 Mr. Puneet Jain, Adv. Ms. Ankita Gupta, Adv. Mr. Navdeep Singh, Adv. Ms. Pratibha Jain ,Adv. Ms. Naghma Imtiaz, Adv. Mohd. Asad Khan, Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay ,Adv. Ms. Gunwant Dara, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal ,Adv.

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. K. L. Janjani ,Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra ,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv. Mr. Sarvesh Singh Baghel, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Despite granting time by the Registrar Court to take steps on the unserved respondents, no steps have been taken. A request is made, as a last chance, to take steps to the unserved respondents.

As a last chance, one week's time is granted to take steps to serve upon the unserved respondents. If steps are not taken within the stipulated time, the petitions against the unserved respondents shall be deemed to be rejected without further reference to this Court.

(S.K. RAKHEJA) (MALA KUMARI SHARMA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(72) - 30 Apr 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(71) - 18 Mar 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(70) - 6 May 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(69) - 12 Mar 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(68) - 30 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(67) - 8 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(66) - 11 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(65) - 22 Sept 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(64) - 18 Sept 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(63) - 9 Aug 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(60) - 27 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(61) - 27 Feb 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(62) - 27 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(57) - 23 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(58) - 23 Jan 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(59) - 23 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(54) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(55) - 12 Jul 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(56) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(51) - 5 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(52) - 5 Jul 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(53) - 5 Jul 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(48) - 26 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(49) - 26 Apr 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(50) - 26 Apr 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(45) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(46) - 3 Mar 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(47) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(42) - 27 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(43) - 27 Oct 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(44) - 27 Oct 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(38) - 26 Aug 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(39) - 26 Aug 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(40) - 26 Aug 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(41) - 26 Aug 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(36) - 7 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(37) - 7 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(34) - 26 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(35) - 26 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(32) - 12 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(33) - 12 Dec 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(31) - 14 Jul 2014

ROP

Viewing

Order(30) - 13 Feb 2014

ROP

Click to view

Order(29) - 22 Nov 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(28) - 3 Oct 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 6 Aug 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(26) - 15 Jul 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(25) - 16 Apr 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(24) - 26 Feb 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(23) - 11 Jan 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(22) - 19 Nov 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(21) - 24 Sept 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 9 Aug 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 3 Jul 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 2 Jul 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(17) - 11 May 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(16) - 8 May 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(15) - 12 Apr 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 2 Mar 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 14 Dec 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 7 Dec 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(11) - 26 Sept 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(10) - 25 Aug 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(9) - 21 Jul 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 10 May 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(7) - 4 Apr 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(6) - 14 Jan 2011

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 16 Dec 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 12 Nov 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 4 Oct 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(2) - 30 Aug 2010

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 26 Jul 2010

ROP

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data