Engineer-In-Chief, Public Health, Odisha vs. Nandakishore Sethy
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
22 Aug 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.5
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 37400/2024
(Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 30-11-2023 in WA No. 2768/2023 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack)
STATE OF ODISHA & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
CHAKRADHAR MISHRA
Respondent $(s)$
(IA NO.214234/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Date: 27-09-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
Mr. Som Raj Choudhury, AOR For Petitioner(s) Ms. Shrutee Aradhana, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
0 R D F R
- Delay condoned.
Heard Mr. Som Raj Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the $2.$ petitioners.
The counsel produces copy of the order dated 22.07.2024 in the 3. SLP (Civil) Diary No. 25160 of 2024 where notice was issued in a similar matter.
The counsel submits that the Single Judge while granting $\mathbf{4}$ relief to the respondent No.1 with direction to consider him for ature Not Verifie With a post for the said purpose. It is contended that such direction for creation of post,
$\mathbf{1}$
could not have been issued by the Writ Court. However the Writ Appeal filed by the State before the Division Bench was not entertained on the ground of delay, by the impugned order.
5. The counsel submits that the delay should have been condoned by the Division Bench and the State's appeal should have been considered on merit.
6. Issue notice.
7. Tag with SLP (Civil) Diary No. 25160 of 2024.
(NITIN TALREJA) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR