S. H. Baig vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

N ITEM NO.16 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IVA

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).30992-30993/2011

KU. JAYA CHOUDHARY AND ORS Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MP THROUGH SECRETARY & ORS Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim relief and office report )

WITH SLP(C) NO.15743-15745/2012

Date: 27/09/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Lakshmi Raman Singh,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr Vikas Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. B.S. Banthia,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Nobody is present for the petitioner. Let there be fresh notice with additional dasti service on unserved respondents in SLP(C) No. 15743-15745/2012. The litigant has to confirm dasti notice directly upon the litigant-respondent. However, they are permitted to serve through the nearest Civil Court/Trial Court where private parties are concerned and through standing counsel where State authorities are concerned.

-2- Item No.16 Process fee and spare copies are to be filed before 8.10.2012, else list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution. If notices are issued, list again on 3.12.2012.

So far as SLP(C) No. 30992-30993/2011 is concerned, if petitioner fails to disclose outcome of dasti service before 31.10.2012, list before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution.

hj