Union Of India vs. Sanjeev Sharma
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.32 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION III
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. PAVANESH D.
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21703/2022
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
MUNJAAL MANISHBHAI BHATT & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.161939/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.161938/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT )
WITH
SLP(C) No. 23187/2022 (III)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.178585/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.178586/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.178584/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)
SLP(C) No. 249/2023 (III)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.191805/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.191809/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.191807/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)
Date : 02-03-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Ms. Gargi Khanna, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Malak Manish Bhatt, AOR
Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, AOR
Mr. Ashish Podar, Adv.
- Mr. Devendra Singh, AOR
- Mr. Karan Thakur, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the Court made the following
O R D E R
SLP(C) No.21703/2022
Respondent no.1 has already filed counter affidavit.
Despite due service on respondent no.3, there is no appearance.
Four weeks time, is granted to respondent no.2, to file counter affidavit.
After expiry of the said period, matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
SLP(C) No. 23187/2022
Despite due service on respondent nos.1 to 3, there is no appearance.
Hence, process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
SLP(C) No. 249/2023
Ld. Counsel for petitioner has filed affidavit of dasti service after having served copy of petition on respondent no.1. Hence, service is deemed to be complete on respondent no.1.
However, at this stage, Sh. Karan Thakur, Ld. Advocate appearing for Sh. Devender Singh, Ld. AOR, seeks for time, to file vakalatnama and counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no.1.
Four weeks time, is granted to respondent no.1 to file vakalatnama and to both respondent nos.1 and 2 to file counter affidavit.
After expiry of the said period, matter be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
PAVANESH D. Registrar