All Assam Ahom Association Represented By Its President Mr. Jnanandan Phukan vs. Union Of India Represented By The Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
27 Sept 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ºItem No.40 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION PIL(W) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 916/2014 JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE FOR BENGALI REFUGEES & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS U.O.I & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for deletion of respondents and exemption from filing O.T. and stay and office report) Date : 26/10/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhinav Mukerji,Adv. Mr. A. Selvin Raja,Adv. Mr. Aniruddha P. M ayee,Adv. Ms. Alka Sinha,Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma,Adv. Ms. B. Khushbansi,Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. Sandeepan Pathak,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. Milind Kumar,Adv. Mr. Somnath Banerjee,Adv. Mr. Parijat Sinha,Adv. Mr. Shikhar Garg,Adv. Mr. P. V. Yogeswaran,Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. ..2/- Item No.40 - 2 - Mrs Sarla Chandra,Adv. Mr. Mohd. Waquas,Adv. Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh,Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy,Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur,Adv. M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.,Adv. Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran,Adv. Ms. G. Indira,Adv. Ms. Mamta Singh,Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv. Mr. Pratap Venugopal,Adv. M/s. K. J. John & Co.,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun,Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv. Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru,Adv. Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Respondent Nos. 15,16,17,20, 21 and 23 to 25, 27 and 37 have already filed the counter affidavit. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3, 5, 9, 11,18,22,28, 29, 30, 35 and 36 have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. S ervice of notice is complete on the respondent Nos. 4,6,7,8,10,12 to 14, 19, 26, 31 to 34 and 38 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules. Item No.40 - 2 - However, Mr. Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru , Ld. Advocate has appeared on
behalf of State of Maharashtra (Respondent No.19). He may file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit in the meantime.
(M V RAMESH) Registrar