Santosh Kumar vs. State Of U. P

COURT NO.7

SECTION XI

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CONMT.PET.(C) Nos. 840-843/2021 in CONMT.PET.(C) Nos. 490-493/2021 in SLP(C) Nos. 7157-7160/2021

RAJESH KUMAR CHATURVEDI ETC.

Petitioner(s)

DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS.ETC.

Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION)

ITEM NO.3+13

WTTH

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 853-855/2021 in SLP(C) No. 11709-11711/2021 (XI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.130022/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 953/2021 in CONMT.PET.(C) No. 690/2021 (XI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.148524/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 952/2021 in CONMT.PET.(C) No. 689/2021 (XI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.149173/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 954/2021 in CONMT.PET.(C) No. 670/2021 (XI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.149194/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Item No. 13

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 218-278/2022 in SLP(C) No. 3676-3738/2022 IA No. 43517/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) Nos. 212-217/2022 in SLP(C) No. 3739-3744/2022 (XI) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 43982/2022 IA No. 43982/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Date: 27-04-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM:

nature Not Verified Digitally signed by

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH

Alilla Malloya<br>Date: $2022.04.30$	Reason Petitioner(s)	Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. R.K. Singh, Adv.
		Ms. Neeraj Singh, Adv.
		Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Adv.

VFRSUS

	Ms. Ritu Reniwal, Adv.<br>Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Adv.<br>Mr. Tom Joseph, AOR
	Mr. Shyam Divan Sr. Adv<br>Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv.<br>Mr. Suyash Srivastava, Adv.<br>Mr. Shreya Mishra, Adv.<br>Ms. Pratibha Shukla, Adv.<br>Mr. Madhumay Mishra, Adv.<br>Mr. Praveen Gaur, Adv.<br>Mr. Prakhar Srivastava, Adv.<br>Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR
	Mr. Nidhesh gupta, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. R.K. Singh, Adv.<br>Ms. Neeraj Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Nitish Kumar Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Praveen Pathak, Adv.<br>Mr. C.M. Patel, Adv.<br>Mr. Sajith. P, AOR
For U.P. Basic<br>Parishad	Mr. Harish Pandey, AOR
For Respondent(s)	Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, ASG<br>Mr. Krishnanand Pandeya, AOR<br>Ms. Sansriti Pathak, Adv.<br>Ms. Kirti Khangarot, Adv.<br>Ms. Anzu. K. Varkey, AOR<br>Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR
	Dr. Manish Singhvi, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Arpit Parkash, Adv.<br>Mr. Sandeep Kumar Jha, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General representing the respondent-State of Uttar Pradesh and its functionaries submits that they have complied the interim order passed by this Court on 22.02.2022.

She further submits that any petitioner(s)-teacher(s) has any grievance as to their salary and appointment pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court on 22.02.2022, they can make representation(s) in this behalf to the authority concerned. On such representation being made, the authority concerned will consider the same in accordance with the interim order passed by this Court on 22.02.2022 within two weeks from the date of submission of the representation.

Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, learned senior counsel submits that the petitioner would like to file the response to the Compliance Report filed by the State of U.P. within a period of four weeks from today. Four weeks' time is granted accordingly.

List all the contempt petitions alongwith main matters after eight weeks on a non misc. day.

(NEELAM GULATI) (KAMLESH RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)