The State Of Haryana Haryana Urban Development Authority Chief Administrator vs. Mohinder S Virdy

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:26 Jun 2019
CNR:SCIN010249142012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

Before:

Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice

Stage:

Ordinary Civil Matters : Matters relating to allotment, cancellation, fixation of prices of plots/flats

Remarks:

Dismissed

Listed On:

26 Jun 2019

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9168 OF 2013

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS

MOHINDER S. VIRDY & ANR. Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order dated February 03, 2012 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Delay and default in allotment of plot was attributable to the appellant. The respondent had suffered on this account, though he had made part payment of 25% in 1981 and then entire payment in 1995. Allegation that the respondent could be responsible for disappearance of the file is false and pretence to cover up the lapses and defaults. The allegation is farcical and irrational as the respondent has suffered and denied allotment of the plot for which he was waiting and had made substantial part payment in 1981 and full payment in 1995. We see no reason to disbelieve the respondent as has been set out and lucidly elucidated in the impugned judgment.

There is no merit in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed. Compliance of the High Court judgment would be made within three months from today.

.......................... J. (SANJIV KHANNA)

.......................... J. (B.R. GAVAI)

New Delhi; June 26, 2019.

ITEM NO.106 COURT NO.4 SECTION IV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s). 9168/2013

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

MOHINDER S VIRDY & ANR. Respondent(s)

Date : 26-06-2019 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

For Appellant(s) Mr. Anil Grover, AAG Mr. Rahul Khurana, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR

Ms. Anubha Agrawal, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Manoj Swarup, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ankit Swarup, Adv. Mr. Mukul Kumar, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

There is no merit in the appeal, which is accordingly dismissed in terms of the signed order.

(R. NATARAJAN) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH) (Signed order is placed on the file)