B Sai Kalyan Chakarvarthi Etc vs. Govt. Of A. P. Tr. Chief Sec.

ITEM NO.30 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).23164-23165/2012 B SAI KALYAN CHAKARVARTHI ETC. Petitioner(s) VERSUS GOVT.OF A.P.TR.CHIEF SEC.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 23171 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 23807-23808 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 24313 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 25219-25220 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 27593 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 18/02/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Hitendra Nath R., Adv. Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao,Adv. Mrs. Sudha Gupta, Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Adv. Mrs. Prabha Swami, Adv. Mr. G. Balaji, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Mahalakshmi Pavani, Adv. Ms. Prabha Swami, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. Ms. Filza Moonis, Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad ,Adv Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao ,Adv Mr. Gunnam Venkateswara Rao ,Adv Item No.30 -2- Mr. M. Rambabu, Adv. Mr. G.N.Reddy ,Adv. Mr. Anshuman Ashok, Adv. Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi ,Adv Mr. B. Subrahmanya Prasad ,Adv M/s Lawyer's Knit & Co. Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos.25219-20/2012 The office report indicates that counter affidavit has been filed by respondent Nos.2 and 3 but the copy has not been served. However, the

˜*

learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents have conceded that copies of the same have been duly received by them.

Two weeks' time is granted to respondent No.1, State of U.P., as a final chance, for filing counter affidavit on record. SLP(C) No.27593/2012

The office report indicates that in all there are 19 respondents. The status of the remaining respondents, barring respondent No.19, has not been given in the office report.

It appears that respondent No.19 has filed counter affidavit but the copy has not been served. Needful be done by the next date.

Registry to submit a complete office report by the next date.

Item No.30 -3-

SLP(C) Nos.23164-65/2012

In these batch of matters, the office report is very vague and cryptic, as it only specifies the status of respondent Nos.3, 20 and 21. They have filed counter affidavit but not served the copy on the other side. Needful be done by the next date. Office to submit a clear and specific report by the next date to facilitate this Court to pass further necessary orders.

SLP(C) No.23171/2012

In this matter, the office report is very vague and cryptic, as it only specifies the status of respondent No.2. He has filed counter affidavit but not served the copy on the other side. Needful be done by the next date. Office to submit a clear and specific report by the next date to facilitate this Court to pass further necessary orders. SLP(C) No.23807-08/2012

In these batch of matters, the office report is very vague and cryptic, as it only specifies the status of respondent No.17. He has filed counter affidavit but not served the copy on the other side. Needful be done by the next date. Office to submit a clear and specific report by the next date to facilitate this Court to pass further necessary orders.

Item No.30 -4-

Similarly, the learned counsel for the petitioner is reported to have filed an application for filing additional documents on record on 4.2.2013 but has not served the copy on the other side. Needful be done by the next date.

SLP(C) No.24313/2012

In this matter, the office report is very vague and cryptic, as it only specifies the status of respondent Nos.3 and 19. They have filed counter affidavit but not served the copy on the other side. Needful be done by the next date. Office to submit a clear and specific report by the next date to facilitate this Court to pass further necessary orders.

All the duly represented respondents in all the matters are granted two weeks' time, as a final chance for filing counter affidavit. List again on 12.3.2013.

rd