Kusum Garg vs. The State Of Haryana Through Commissioner And Secretary Urban Development
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).21354/2011 (From the judgement and order dated 19/04/2011 in CWP No.13309/2007 of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)
ANIL AGGARWAL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS Respondent(s) (With office report) With SLP(C)No.23292/2011 With appln. for permission to file addl. documents and with prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C)NO.24150/2011 (with prayer for interim relief and office report) With SLP(C)NO.23630 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 09/09/2011 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. K.K. Venugopal,Sr.Adv. Ms. Indu Malhotra,Sr.Adv. Mr. Kush Chaturvedi,Adv. Mr. Vivek Jain,Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta,Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha,Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy,Adv. Mr. K.N. Aggarwal,Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sangal,Adv. Mr. Sanjay Goyal,Adv. Ms. Naina Kejeriwal,Adv. Mr. D.P. Mohanty,Adv. ....2/- -2- For Respondent(s) Dr.(Mrs.)Vipin Gupta,Adv. Mr. P.N. Puri,Adv.(NP) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Permission to file additional documents is granted. Issue notice. Both parties are directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on today.