Prajna Ammembala vs. Koteshwar S. Muralidhar
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
7 Sept 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Ú ITEM NO.301 IN CHAMBERS SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).6231/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 14/03/2012 in CRLP No.4422/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE) KOTESWAR S MURALIDHAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and stay and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 7539 of 2012 (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report) Date: 20/11/2013 These Petitions were taken up for hearing in Chamber today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv. for Mr. B. Subrahmanya Prasad,Adv. Mr. S.S. Javali, Sr. Adv. for Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.S. Javali, Sr. Adv. for Mr. Ankolekar Gurudatta,Adv. Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Adv. (Not Present) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner (husband) in S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 6231 of 2012 as also respondent No. 2 (wife) along with the child are present in person along with their counsel. We have been told that the parties are exploring the possibility of an amicable settlement. As a first measure, we deem it expedient that their son, namely, Sankalpa be allowed to be in the company of the father till 5.00 p.m. today. Needless to state that, thereafter, the child shall be given to the mother. If the mother wishes to remain with the child during the period, she can do so. The petitioner (husband) undertakes to hand over the Passport to his counsel. List the matters tomorrow at 10.00 a.m. in the Chamber.
| (S.K. Rakheja) | |(Phoolan Wati Arora) | |Court Master | |Court Master |