Prajna Ammembala vs. Koteshwar S. Muralidhar

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Anil R. Dave
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:3 Jul 2014
CNR:SCIN010246362012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

7 Sept 2012

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

\212 1 ITEM NO.301 COURT NO.4 SECTION IIB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).6231/2012 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/03/2012 in CRLP NO.4422/2009 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka at Bangalore) KOTESWAR S MURALIDHAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for dispensing with service of notice and exemption from filing O.T. and stay and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No.7539/2012 (With prayer for and exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) Date : 03/07/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Basava Prabhu S. Patil, Sr. Adv. Mr. B. Subrahmanya Prasad ,Adv. Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Anupam Lal Das,Adv. Ms. Anitha Shenoy ,Adv. (Not Present) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Perused the reports dated 15.05.2014 and 20.05.2014 of the 1st Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bangalore and the IV Additional Principal Judge and Vacation Judge, Family Court, Bangalore respectively. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sanjay Kumar Date: 2014.07.03 We direct the petitioner mother (Prajna Ammembala) to cause 16:38:10 IST Reason: the production of the child Sankalp on 17.10.2014 before this 2 Court. On the said date, the respondent father (Koteshwar S.

Muralidhar) shall also be present.

List these matters on 17.10.2014 before a Bench of which Hon'ble Kurian Joseph, J. is a member. On the said date, this Court may consider directing all the parties to stay in Delhi for a week.

In the meanwhile, the parties are given liberty to file the additional documents, if any.

(SANJAY KUMAR) (INDU SATIJA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(21) - 13 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 13 May 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 13 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 11 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 11 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 7 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 7 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 17 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 17 Oct 2014

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 17 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 3 Jul 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(11) - 1 Jul 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 1 Jul 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 21 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 21 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 20 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 18 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 4 Oct 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 30 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 2 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 26 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 21 Sept 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 6 Aug 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view