Smita Rajnish Vishwakarma vs. Administrator & Divnl. Commr.

JTEM NO.98 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.K. HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).22747/2010 SMITA RAJNISH VISHWAKARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ADMINISTRATOR & DIVNL.COMMR.& ORS. Respondent(s) Date: 30/03/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Mamta Saxena, Adv. Ms. Anitha Shenoy,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Sukumaran, Adv. Mr. Anand Sukumar, Adv. Mr. Bhupesh Kumar Pathak, Adv. Ms. Pallavio Langar, Adv. M/S. "Coac",Adv. Ms. Meera Mathur ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent No.2 are present. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 seeks four weeks' time to file the counter affidavit. Time, as prayed for, is granted to him. The other served respondents may also file the counter affidavit within the same time, in case they choose to do so. Item No.98 -2- Affidavit in proof of dasti service of respondent No.6 not been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner,

despite opportunities. He seeks two weeks' further time to do so. Time, as prayed for, is granted to him, as last chance, subject, however, to the payment of costs to the tune of Rs.300/-.

List again on 13.5.2011.

(M.K.HANJURA) REGISTRAR