Amrit Lal Seth (D) By Lrs vs. Seth Hotels Private Ltd Thr. Director
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
24 Aug 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
F ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25298/2012 AMRIT LAL SETH Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S SETH HOTELS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for bringing LRs on record and prayer for interim relief and office report ) Date: 28/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Vishal Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Shefali Mitra, Adv. Mr. S.K. Dhingra,Adv. Mr Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi ,Adv Mr. Ram Swarup Sharma ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Respondent Nos. 1,23 and 25 are granted six weeks time as final chance for filing counter affidavit.
It appears that respondent No.1 was already proceeded ex parte vide order dt.13.11.2013 and subsequent on his behalf the ld. Counsel, Mr K.B.Rohtagi filed his vakalatnama on record. Steps for setting aside ex parte order be taken by next date. Similarly, six weeks time is granted for filing counter affidavit to the respondent. Complete set of pleadings has been already received by the ld. counsel Mr K.B.Rohtagi. -2-
Item No.61
Similarly, respondent Nos.2,3,16,17,28 are granted six weeks time for filing the counter affidavit. Complete set of pleadings has been received by the ld. Counsel appearing on their behalf.
Respondent Nos. 9,10,13,26 and 32 are already proceeded ex parte.
It appears that the ld. Counsel for the petitioner has moved an application for substituted service in respect of unserved respondents Nos. 4 to 8,11,12,14,15, 18 to 25,27,29 to 31,33. It seems that office objection has been received that the copy has not been served on the other side but in my opinion it is not at all necessary to serve copy on the other side as it only relates to substituted service on unserved respondents. Registry to process the application for substituted service before the ld. Registrar in Chambers for necessary orders/directions.
List again on 15.4.2014.
hj