Amrit Lal Seth (D) By Lrs vs. Seth Hotels Private Ltd Thr. Director

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Adarsh Kumar Goel
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:28 Jan 2014
CNR:SCIN010242392012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

24 Aug 2012

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

F ITEM NO.61 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25298/2012 AMRIT LAL SETH Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S SETH HOTELS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for bringing LRs on record and prayer for interim relief and office report ) Date: 28/01/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr Vishal Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Anil Nag,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms Shefali Mitra, Adv. Mr. S.K. Dhingra,Adv. Mr Mahesh Kasana, Adv. Mr. K.B. Rohtagi ,Adv Mr. Ram Swarup Sharma ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Respondent Nos. 1,23 and 25 are granted six weeks time as final chance for filing counter affidavit.

It appears that respondent No.1 was already proceeded ex parte vide order dt.13.11.2013 and subsequent on his behalf the ld. Counsel, Mr K.B.Rohtagi filed his vakalatnama on record. Steps for setting aside ex parte order be taken by next date. Similarly, six weeks time is granted for filing counter affidavit to the respondent. Complete set of pleadings has been already received by the ld. counsel Mr K.B.Rohtagi. -2-

Item No.61

Similarly, respondent Nos.2,3,16,17,28 are granted six weeks time for filing the counter affidavit. Complete set of pleadings has been received by the ld. Counsel appearing on their behalf.

Respondent Nos. 9,10,13,26 and 32 are already proceeded ex parte.

It appears that the ld. Counsel for the petitioner has moved an application for substituted service in respect of unserved respondents Nos. 4 to 8,11,12,14,15, 18 to 25,27,29 to 31,33. It seems that office objection has been received that the copy has not been served on the other side but in my opinion it is not at all necessary to serve copy on the other side as it only relates to substituted service on unserved respondents. Registry to process the application for substituted service before the ld. Registrar in Chambers for necessary orders/directions.

List again on 15.4.2014.

hj

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(45) - 19 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(44) - 16 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(43) - 22 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(42) - 5 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(41) - 2 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 25 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(40) - 25 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(37) - 7 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 7 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(35) - 5 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 5 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 18 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(34) - 18 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 12 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 12 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 1 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 29 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 29 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 11 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 11 Jan 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 3 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 3 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 26 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 26 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 3 Jul 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 3 Jul 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 25 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 25 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 3 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 3 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 28 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 28 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 5 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 5 Sept 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 7 Jul 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 15 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 28 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(8) - 13 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 25 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 7 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 25 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 15 Mar 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 20 Feb 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 19 Sept 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 7 Sept 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data