Neetu vs. Parmod Kumar

¨ ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.9 SECTION XVIA

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1082/2014

NEETU PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

PARMOD KUMAR RESPONDENT(S) (WITH APPLN. (S) FOR STAY AND OFFICE REPORT)

Date : 05/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Deepender Hooda, Adv. Mr. Atishi Dipankar, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Rajinder Mathur, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The transfer petition is dismissed in terms of the

signed order.

[VINOD LAKHINA]	[ASHA SONI]
COURT MASTER	COURT MASTER

[SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE]

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by Vinod Lakhina Date: 2015.01.06 16:37:05 IST Reason:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1082 OF 2014

NEETU ...PETITIONER

VERSUS

PARMOD KUMAR ...RESPONDENT

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the parties at

length.

We have considered the statements made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent. The petitioner - wife is working in Bahadurgarh, Haryana, which is about 50 kms. from Rohtak, Haryana, though she claims to be residing in Rohini, Delhi. Even if the said claim is accepted, it will not be difficult for the petitioner to travel from Rohini, Delhi to Rohtak, Haryana. In that view of the matter, the transfer petition is dismissed.

....................,J. (RANJAN GOGOI)

....................,J. (ARUN MISHRA)

NEW DELHI JANUARY 05, 2015