Sophia Homeopathic Medical College And Research Institute vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.11
COURT NO.6
SECTION IV-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s).4799/2022$
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 31-08-2021 in WP No.100652/2021 passed by the High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench at Dharwad)
NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR HOMEOPATHY
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE KARNATAKA PRIVATE HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION & ORS. Respondent $(s)$
(I.A.NOS. 108968/2023, 108975/2023, 109522/2023 AND 109567/2023 IN SLP(C)NO.4799/2022
IA No. 109567/2023 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 108975/2023 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 108968/2023 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT <pre>IA No. 109522/2023 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)</pre>
Date: 30-05-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL (VACATION BENCH)
| For Petitioner(s) Dr. Sushil Balwada, AOR<br>Mr. Sunil Narula, Adv.<br>Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhishek Raj, Adv.<br>Mr. Sandiv Kalia, Adv. | |
|---|---|
| Mr. Sunil Narula, Adv. | |
| Mr. Kundan Kr. Mishra, AOR<br>Mr. Jitender Kumar, Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s)<br>nature Not Verified | Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. (NP)<br>Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR<br>Ms. Archana Pathak Dave, Adv.<br>Ms. Chitrangda Rashtrawara, Adv.<br>Mr. Pratyush Shrivastava, Adv.<br>Dr. Arun Kumar Yadav, Adv. |
Ms. B.L.N. Shivani, Adv.
Ms. Shreya Jain, Adv. Mr. Sarvan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Bhagwan Swaroop Shukla, Adv. Mrs. Sunita Shukla, Adv. Mr. Dashmesh Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Saksham Sethi, Adv. Mr. Ranjay Kr. Dubey, AOR Mr. Animesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Nishant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Nishant Kumar, AOR Mr. K. B. Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. S. N. Tripathi, Adv. Ms. Pinki Tiwari, Adv. Mr. S. R. Setija, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
-
Various applications for impleadment and clarification/direction are on board.
-
Since the date of examination has not yet been notified by the relevant University, we find no urgency to consider these applications at this stage.
-
We make it clear that pendency of these applications shall not debar the relevant University from declaring the date of examination. Once the date of examination is notified, the aggrieved students as well as the colleges, in which they have taken admission, shall be at liberty to seek urgent consideration of these applications.
(DEEPAK JOSHI) (DIPTI KHURANA)
COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR