Raj Kumar vs. State Of Himachal Pradesh Through Its Secretary Technical Education
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
26 Jul 2016
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Listed On: 09.09.2016 Court No.: Item No. :
SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) No. 20353 of 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
RAJ KUMAR & ANR. ...PETITIONERS
VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
OFFICE REPORT
The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.07.2016, when the Court was pleased to pass the following Order:-
"Issue notice, returnable after four weeks.
Dasti process, in addition, is permitted.
Liberty is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioners to serve the State of Himachal Pradesh through the standing counsel nominated by the State of Himachal Pradesh for this Court."
It is submitted that as directed above show cause notice returnable for 09.09.2016 to all the 23 respondents was issued on 11.08.2016. Mr.Varinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate has on 8.9.2016 filed vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 but has not filed Counter Affidavit. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Bansal, Advocate has on 07.09.2016 filed vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent Nos. 5, 7, 8, 12 to 14, 21 and 23 but has not filed counter-affidavit so far. As per postal tracking report notice has been delivered to Respondent Nos. 11, 15, 19, 20 but no one has entered appearance so far while the tracking report shows as 'not available' in respect of Respondent Nos. 6, 9, 10, 16, 17, 18 and 22 .
Service is not complete on Respondent Nos. 6, 9, 10, 16, 17, 18 and 22.
The matter above-mentioned is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this Office Report.
DATED THIS THE 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to :-
Mr. Abhinav Shrivastava, Advocate Mr. Rajeev Bansal, Advocate