Ishwara Bhat (Dead) By Lr vs. K. Usman Shafi (Dead) By Lrs

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Madan B. Lokur
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:1 Dec 2016
CNR:SCIN010240422015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

REGISTRAR COURT. 1

SECTION IVA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s). 24824-24827/2015

ISHWARA BHAT (SINCE DEAD) BY LRS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

K. USMAN SHAFI AND ORS.

ITEM NO.43

Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for permission to place addl. documents on record and substituted service)

Date: 01/12/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr D.P.Chaturvedi, Adv. Ms. Anuradha Mutatkar, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr Prateek Dhir, Adv. M/s. Lawyer S Knit & Co, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Opportunity to respondent no.1 to file counter affidavit has already been declined,

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent no.2 within two weeks time as last opportunity. Notice thereafter be issued.

Signature Motive Mone appears for respondent nos.3,4(1),4(2), 5(1), $\frac{16.58}{\text{Res}^{\text{NS}}}$ , 5(4), 5(5), 6 to 10, 11(1) to 11(3), 11(7) to $11(9)$ , $12$ , $13(1)$ , $13(3)$ , $13(5)$ to $13(7)$ despite due service.

Item No.43

Defects in the application for substitution of legal representatives of deceased petitioner no.2 may be cured within two weeks time. Registry thereafter to process under rules.

Application for substituted service of respondent nos. 5(3), 5(6), 11(4), 11(6), 13(2), 13(4) is allowed. Notices accordingly be issued.

Ld. counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has already filed an application for deletion of respondent no.2. Registry to verify and if so, process under rules.

List again on 20.1.2017.

(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(29) - 20 Mar 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 20 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 2 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 11 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 24 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 11 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 11 Aug 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 18 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 22 Feb 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 22 Feb 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 20 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 20 Jan 2017

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 20 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 1 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(15) - 1 Dec 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 1 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 28 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 28 Sept 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 28 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 26 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 26 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 8 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 8 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 23 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 23 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 7 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 4 Sept 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 4 Sept 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data