Govardhan vs. State Of M. P

ITEM NO.25 COURT NO.14 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2471/2014 (From the judgement and order dated 03/12/2013 in FAFO No.3232/2013 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) M/S RODONIGHT INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S UNIQUE INFRA Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and prayer for interim relief) Date: 10/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anjali Bhargava, Adv, Mr. Nitin Singh, Adv. Mr. Pahlad Singh Sharma,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. C.D. Singh, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Dhama, Adv. Mr. Anjani Mumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Rana Pratap Singh, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the peculiar circumstances of this case, we are of the opinion that the parties should

We direct the Trial Court to decide the suit expeditiously. We make it clear that the suit may be decided independently and in accordance with law and without being influenced by the status quo order passed by us today.

Order of status quo shall replace the impugned order passed by the High Court.

Special Leave Petition is disposed of accordingly.

maintain status quo during the pendency of the suit.

Â