Gyanjeet Sewa Mission Trust Managing Trustee vs. Union Of India Secretary Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble A.M. Khanwilkar
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List for Final Hearing/Disposal At Misc. Stage, List After (Weeks) [6], Notice Returnable [D:0,W:4,M:0]
Listed On:
21 Aug 2017
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.2 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).675/2017
GYANJEET SEWA MISSION TRUST Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.71872/2017-STAY APPLICATION) Date : 21-08-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR For Petitioner(s) Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Sr.Adv. Mr.Amalpushp Shroti, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr.Maninder Singh, ASG Dr.Nishesh Sharma, Adv. Mr.Vibhu S. Misra, Adv. Mr.R.Balasubramanian, Adv. Ms.Nisha Sharma, Adv. Mr.Prabhas Bajaj, Adv. Mr.Akshay Amritanshu, Adv. Mr.G.S.Makker, Adv. Mr.Gaurav Sharma, Adv. Ms.Amandeep Kaur, Adv. Mr.Prateek Bhatia, Adv. Mr.Dhawal Mohan, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Issue notice fixing a returnable date within four weeks. As Mr.R.Balasubramanian, learned counsel and Mr.Gaurav Sharma, learned counsel have entered appearance for respondent No.1-Union of India and respondent Digitally signed by ASHOK RAJ SINGH Date: 2017.08.23 13:34:44 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
No.2-Medical Council of India respectively, no further
notice need be issued. They undertake to file counter affidavits within four weeks hence. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List after six weeks for final disposal.
In the course of hearing an apprehension was expressed by Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the batch that is admitted in 2016-2017 might be disturbed. If such a situation arises, the petitioner is at liberty to mention.
In the meantime, the bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner shall not be encashed and the same shall be kept alive.
(Ashok Raj Singh) (H.S.Parasher) Court Master Assistant Registrar