Vimal vs. Arun
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
20 Sept 2006
Order Text
ÌITEM NO.64 COURT NO.6 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).16154/2006 (From the judgement and order dated 26/06/2006 in in CA 134/06 in FA No. 12/2006 & 24.7.2006 in CA No. 4406/2006 in FA 12/2006 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT NAGPUR) VIMAL Petitioner(s) VERSUS ARUN Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief ) Date: 15/01/2007 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.K. SEMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Satyajit A. Desai, Adv. Mrs. Anagha S. Desai, Adv. Mr. Amol N. Suryawanshi, Adv. Mr. Vikram Saluja, Adv. Mr. Venkateswara Rao Anumolu,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The order impugned being an interim order, we see no reason to interfere. The special leave petition is dismissed.
(PAWAN KUMAR) (R.K. KUMAR)
COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order