Deepak Patel vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.6 SECTION XI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 29972/2019

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-09-2019 in WA No. 23733/2018 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

ATUL KUMAR DWIVEDI & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R.[ PAPERS PERTAINING TO SLP (C) DIARY NO. 39931/2019 BE PLACED ALONGWITH THIS MATTER ] )

WITH

SLP(C) No. 30456/2019 (XI)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.196975/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.196974/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T)

SLP(C) No. 30607/2019 (XI)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.197752/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

SLP(C) No. 30552/2019 (XI)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.197427/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.197426/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 3157/2020 (XI)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.19726/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Date : 28-02-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

For Petitioner(s)	Ms. Pallavi Pratap, Adv.
	Mr. Rohit Sthalekar, Adv.
	Mr. Sankalp Narain, Adv.
	Ms. Vaneeta, Adv.
	Ms. Neema, Adv.
	M/S. M/s Pratap<br>And Co., AOR

Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rohit Amit Sthalekar, AOR Mr Sankalp Narain,Adv. Mr. Srivats Narain, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Pratap, Adv. Mr. Bhav Ratan, Adv. Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Mr. Vinod Diwakar, AAG(UP) Mr. B.N. Dubey,Adv. Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Vivek Sharma, AOR Mr. Yadav Narender Singh, AOR Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Nidhi Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rachit Mittal, Adv. Ms. Rachana Sharma, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Dixit, Adv. Mr.Manoj Tomar, Adv. Ms. Vibha Dutta Makhija, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv. Mr. Girdhar Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Shreya Mishra, Adv. Mr. Satyajeet Kumar, AOR Mr. Danish Zubair Khan, AOR Mohd. Asad Khan, Adv. Mr Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ajay Chaudhart, Adv. Mr. Badri Prasad Singh, AOR Ms. Neha Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Sunil K. Khattri, Adv. Mr. R.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Singh,Adv. Ms. Rity Reniwal, Adv. Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Adv. Mr. Robin Khokhar, AOR Ms. Sarita Kumari,Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishal Arun Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Mukesh Kr. Singh, Adv.

M/S. Mukesh Kumar Singh And Co., AOR Mr. Shantanu Jugtawat, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Adv. Mr. Prashant Agrwal,Adv. Ms. Preetika Dwivedi, AOR Mr. C.A. Sunderam, Sr. Adv. Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, AOR Ms. Ravi Chandra Prakash, Adv. Mr. Amit, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Tripathi, Adv. Ms. Vani Vyas, Adv. Ms. Sushma Singh, Adv. Mr. A. Deb Kumar, Adv. Ms. A. Deepa, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kr. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Atulesh Kumar, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties and with their assistance we have gone through the record.

We direct the State and the Board to file appropriate affidavits indicating:

(a) How many candidates had secured minimum 50% of marks before the normalization process was applied and who were also found to be eligible in the subsequent two stages namely scrutiny of documents and physical standard test.

(b) How many candidates were found to have secured minimum 50% marks after normalization process was applied and who were also found to be eligible in the subsequent two stages namely scrutiny of documents and physical standard test.

In other words, the number of candidates who were found eligible without resorting to normalization and after taking resort to normalization, must be available.

(c) Out of these two lists, which are the common names who irrespective of, whether normalization is applied or not would still be qualified.

(d) The affidavit shall also indicate the current vacancy position category-wise and how many seats were actually advertised to be available in the current selection process.

Let the exercise be done within next four days and appropriate affidavits be filed on or before 5.3.2020.

Pending further consideration, there shall be stay of proceedings in any contempt filed in relation to the present matter.

List on 6.3.2020.

(INDU MARWAH) (PRADEEP KUMAR)

COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER