Tata Steel Ltd Thr. Its Chief Legal (Corporate Matters) Mrs Meena Lall vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Coal
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.43 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s).8157/2018
TATA STEEL LIMITED THR. ITS CHIEF LEGAL (CORPORATE MATTERS) MRS MEENA LALL Appellant(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COAL SECRETARY & ORS. Respondent(s) (I.A 52360/2019 in C.A. 8159/2018 to be listed only, on 6.5.2019 )
WITH I.A 52360/2019 in C.A.8159/2018 (XVII) (For stay)
Date : 06-05-2019 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
| For Appellant(s) | Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Punit Dutt Tyagi,AOR<br>Mr. Ankit Parhar,Adv.<br>Ms. Swastika Chakravarti,Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s)<br>State | Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Krishnanand Pandey,AOR<br>Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh,AOR<br>Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh,Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
I.A.No.52360/2019 in CA No.8159/2018 :
We are of the view that the matter would not require any examination at this stage, save and except that the applicant may secure the amount covered by the demand notices to the satisfaction of the concerned authority. Beyond the above, we make it clear that we have expressed no opinion on the merits and contentions of rival parties. Digitally signed by SARITA PUROHIT Date: 2019.05.06 18:13:02 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
If the security offered satisfies the concerned authority, naturally the demand shall not be enforced. The application is disposed of in the above terms.
Branch Officer AR-cum-PS
(Anand Prakash) (Sarita Purohit)