Lakshmamma vs. Huawei Technologies India Private Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Surya Kant, Hon'ble Ujjal Bhuyan
Stage:
FRESHLY / ADJOURNED MATTERS
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
19 Jul 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.29
COURT NO.4
SECTION IV-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ....................................
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-06-2023 in CA No.143/2022 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru)
LAKSHMAMMA & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Respondent(s)
(IA No.133115/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)
Date: 19-07-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN
| For Petitioner(s) Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Tushar Singh, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Pritha Suri, Adv. | ||
| For M/S. Lawyer S Knit & Co, AOR | ||
For Respondent(s) Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Sr.Adv. Mr. Vikram Hegde, Adv. Ms. Alvia Ahmed, Adv. Mr. Palash Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Hansaraman, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
We have heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners 1. in support of the praver for condonation of delay of 234 days in filing the Special Leave Petition. We do not find any satisfactory explanation for the same.
The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay.
Keeping in view the fact that both the sides 3. $are$ represented by their learned Senior Counsel, we deem it appropriate to direct LXXXIX Commercial Court/Addl.City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, before whom Com.O.S.No.296/2020 is pending, to make an endeavour to decide the Civil Suit as early as possible, preferably within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. 4. It goes without saying that the observations made by the High Court in the interim order shall have no bearing on the merits of the case.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.)
ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR