Chennai Network Infrastructure Ltd. Etc. Etc vs. Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Dhule And Ors. Etc. Etc

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble L. Nageswara Rao
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:30 Jun 2016
CNR:SCIN010236052015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

19 Aug 2015

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO. :

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NOs. 1271-73, 1276 & 1280 OF 2015 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 - 3 OF 2015 (Application for Ex-Parte stay)

CHENNAI NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED ETC. ETC. ....Petitioner

VERSUS

THE AURANGABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DHULE & ORS. ETC. ....Respondent

OFFICE REPORT

The Transfer Petition were listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 03-03-2016 when he was pleased to pass the following Order:-

"T.P.(C)No.1271 of 2015

Respondent Nos. 1-3 have to file counter affidavit within four weeks time. None appears for Respondent No. 2 despite due service. T.P.(C)Nos. 1272 & 1273 of 2015 None appears for all the respondents despite due service. T.P.(C)Nos. 1276 & 1279 of 2015 Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have to file counter affidavit within four weeks time. None appears for Respondent No. 4 despite due service. T.P.(C)No. 1277 of 2015 None appears for Respondent No. 4 despite due service. Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 have to file counter affidavit within four weeks time. List again on 30.06.2016."

Service position of each matter is as under:-

T.P. (c) No. 1271 of 2015

There are four respondents.

It is submitted that Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 but he has not filed Counter Affidavit on their beahlf so far.

Service of notice is complete.

T.P. (c) Nos. 1272 & 1273 of 2015

There are four respondents in both Transfer Petitions..

It is submitted that certificate of service has been received in respect of all the respondent but no one has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of appearance on their behalf so far.

Service of notice is complete.

T.P. (c) Nos. 1276 & 1279 of 2015

There are four respondents in both Transfer Petitions..

It is submitted that M/s. Lemax Lawyer's & Co., Advocate have filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in both transfer Petitons but they have filed Counter Affidavit on their behalf after serving tis copy on the other side.

Service of notice is complete in both the transfer petitions.

T.P. (c) No. 1277 of 2015

There are four respondents

It is submitted that Mr. Sudhanshu Chaudhary, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 but he has not filed Counter Affidavit on their behalf.

Service of notice is complete.

T.P. (c) No. 1278 of 2015

There are four respondents.

It is submitted that Certificate of service has been received in respect of all the respondent but no one has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of appearance on their behalf so far.

Service of notice is complete.

T.P. (c) No. 1280 of 2015

There are four respondents.

It is submitted that Ms. Aparna Jha, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 but she has not filed Counter Affidavit on their behalf.

Service of notice is complete.

The mattersare listed before the Ld. Registrar with this office report.

Dated this the 29th day fo June, 2016.

Copy to : Mr. Nar Hari Singh, Advocate M/s. Lexman Lawyer's & Co., Advocate Ms. Aparna Jha, Advocate Mr. Sudhanshu Chaudhury, Advocate Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate Standing counsel for state of Maharashtra

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(22) - 16 Apr 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 6 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 6 Dec 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 24 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 24 Oct 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 24 Oct 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 26 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 26 Sept 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 26 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 11 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 11 Aug 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 11 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 30 Jun 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 30 Jun 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(10) - 30 Jun 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 3 Mar 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 3 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 28 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 28 Aug 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 28 Aug 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(4) - 28 Aug 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view