Chennai Network Infrastructure Ltd. Etc. Etc vs. Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Dhule And Ors. Etc. Etc
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
19 Aug 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION XVIA
ITEM NO. : 72
TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NOs. 127173, 12761280 OF 2015 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 3 OF 2015 (Application for ExParte stay)
CHENNAI NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED ETC. ETC. ....Petitioner
VERSUS
THE AURANGABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DHULE & ORS. ETC. ....Respondent
OFFICE REPORT
The Transfer Petitions were listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 30062016 when he was pleased to pass the following Order:
"TP(C) NO.1271/2015
Respondent nos. 1 to 3 are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit.
Registry thereafter to process for listing before the Hon'ble Court as and when connected petitions become ready.
TP(C) NO.127273/2015
Service is complete in respect of all the respondents but none has entered appearance.
TP(C) NO.1276,1277,1279,1280 of 2015
Respondent nos. 1 to 3 are granted four weeks time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit.
TP(C) NO.1278/2015
Service is complete in respect of all the respondents but none has entered appearance. List again on 11.8.2016."
Service position of each matter is as under:
T.P. (c) Nos. 1272 & 1273 of 2015
There are four respondents in both Transfer Petitions..
It is submitted that no one has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of appearance on behalf of Respondents so far.
Service of notice is complete. Contd...2/
T.P. (c) Nos. 1276 & 1279 of 2015
There are four respondents in both Transfer Petitions..
It is submitted that M/s. Lemax Lawyer's & Co., Advocate has not filed Counter Affidavit on
behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3 in both transfer petitions so far.
Service of notice is complete in both the transfer petitions.
T.P. (c) No. 1277 of 2015
There are four respondents
It is submitted that Mr. Sudhanshu Chaudhary, Advocate has not filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3 so far.
Service of notice is complete.
T.P. (c) No. 1280 of 2015
There are four respondents.
It is submitted that Ms. Aparna Jha, Advocate has not filed Counter Affidavit on behalf of respondent nos. 1 to 3 so far.
It is further submitted that certificate of service has been received in respect of Respondent
no. 4 but no one has filed vakalatnama and memo of appearance on his behalf so far.
Service of notice is complete.
T.P. (c) No. 1278 of 2015
There are four respondents.
It is submitted that no one has filed Vakalatnama and Memo of appearance on behalf of all
the Respondents so far.
Service of notice is complete.
The matters above mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar with this office report.
Dated this the 10th day fo August, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to : Mr. Nar Hari Singh, Advocate M/s. Lemax Lawyer's & Co., Advocate Ms. Aparna Jha, Advocate Mr. Sudhanshu Chaudhury, Advocate Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate Standing counsel for state of Maharashtra
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR