K. Pooja Chakravarthi vs. The Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Dr. Mgr Medical University

ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).12735/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-06-2022 in WA No. 604/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras)

SRI MUTHUKUMARAN MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE REGISTRAR THE TAMILNADU DR. MGR MEDICAL UNIVERSITY & ANR. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.99637/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 107280/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)

WITH

Diary No(s). 23565/2022 (XII)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.108131/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.108130/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP)

Date : 08-08-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Manan Kumar Mishra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Durga Dutt, AOR Ms. Anjul Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Shukla, Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. Mr. S.S. Madhavan, Adv. Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, AOR Mr. Jatin Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Neha Rathi, Adv. Mr. Kamal Kishore, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP (C) No(s).12735/2022

• 1 Mr Manan Kumar Mishra, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, seeks the permission of the Court to withdraw the Special Leave Petition.
• 2 The Special Leave Petition is dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn.
• 3 Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

SLP (C) Diary No(s). 23565/2022

• 1 Permission to file the Special Leave Petition granted.
• 2 The present petition under Article 136 of the Constitution has been instituted by a batch of students. The companion Special Leave Petition, being SLP(C) No 12735 of 2022, instituted by the Institute has been dismissed as withdrawn against the judgment of the High Court dated 22 June 2022.
• 3 Mr Prashant Bhushan, counsel appearing on behalf of the students, states that though the Institute was directed by the High Court to implead the students, the Institute failed to do so in the proceedings.
• 4 In view of the above submission, the petition is permitted to be withdrawn so as to enable the petitioners to pursue such remedies as are available in law before the High Court.

(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER