The State Of Maharashtra Secretary Water Resource Department vs. Genba Laxman Pawagi
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Ordinary
Stage:
DEFAULT / OTHER MATTERS
Listed On:
26 Sept 2018
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.6 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR.RAJESH KUMAR GOEL
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25368-25404/2017
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
GENBA LAXMAN PAWAGI & ANR. Respondent(s)
(IA No.76341/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.76347/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.90601/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 25455-25490/2017 (IX) (IA No.86941/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.86943/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING and IA No.112455/2017-MODIFICATION)
Date : 26-09-2018 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, AOR Mr Anoop Kandari, Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr Tribikram Meelee, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha Deshmukh, AOR
Respondent no.1 has failed to file counter affidavit
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
SLP(C) No.25368-25404/2017
despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not taken fresh steps despite last opportunity having been granted in respect of respondent nos.5,7,9,13,14,17,18,28,37,38,43,45 and 49. Digitally signed by VINOD KUMAR TIWARI Date: 2018.09.29 13:33:07 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Item No.6
SLP(C) No. 25455-25490/2017
Respondent no.1 has failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity is declined.
Service is complete on respondent nos. 2 to 5,7,10,12,25 and 28.
Await service/track report in respect of respondent nos. 6,8,9,11,13 to 24, 26,27 and 29 to 50.
However, ld. Counsel, Mr Tribikram Meelee appearing on behalf of Mr. Aniruddha Deshmukh, Advocate-on-record appears for all the respondents in both matters and submitted that vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.1 in both matters has been filed and seeks time to file vakalatnama in respect of rest of the respondents in both matters. Be filed within two weeks time. Counter affidavit be filed within four weeks time.
List again on 14.11.2018.
RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Registrar