Roop Chand vs. The State Of Haryana
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble Hemant Gupta, Hon'ble V. Ramasubramanian
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
10 Aug 2021
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 15750- 15751/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08-09-2021 in CM No. 12792/2021 24-09-2021 in CM No. 14242/2021 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)
ROOP CHAND & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.127507/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.127508/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 08-10-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Himanshu Sharma, AOR<br>Mr. K. S. Dadwal, Adv.<br>Mr. Saurabh Garg, Adv. | |
---|---|---|
Ms. Aditi Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr. Naresh Kkumar, Adv.<br>Ms. Seeta Ram Sharma, Adv. |
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
The challenge in the present petitions is to an order declining to advance the date of hearing and to grant status quo. The grievance of the petitioners is that there was a status quo order granted by the High Court on 01.06.2011, which had been vacated on 06.03.2020 on account of absence of learned counsel for the petitioners. Digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora Date: 2021.10.09 12:38:33 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
The petitioners have moved an application for grant of interim order and fresh application for stay and for advancing the date of hearing.
Since the matter is pending before the High Court, we do not find any good reason to entertain the present Special Leave Petitions. The same are, accordingly, dismissed.
However, we grant liberty to the petitioners to move an application before the High Court for deciding the applications. If such an application is filed, we hope that the High Court will take up the matter at an early date.
Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.
(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER