Union Of India vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Administrative Order
Before:
Hon'ble Surya Kant, Hon'ble J.K. Maheshwari
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
17 May 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.29
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).19110/2022
COURT NO.7
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17-12-2021 in DBCWP No.14489/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur)
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED
Date: 17-05-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Divyanshu Kumar Srivastava, Adv. Mr. H.R. Rao, Adv. Mr. Manish, Adv.
| For Respondent(s) Mr. Rahul Kaushik, AOR | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Adv. | ||
| Ms. Prashi Tyagi, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Dhanesh Kumar, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
-
Heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully perused the material placed on record.
-
Since the impugned order dated 17.12.2021, passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, is an exinclude interim order, we are not inclined to entertain this petition $\overline{\text{``under}}$ Article 136 of the Constitution.
The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 3.
$2/$ -
Respondent $(s)$
4. However, the petitioners are at liberty to move an appropriate application before the High Court for vacation/modification of the interim order and/or for final disposal of the Writ Petition, pending adjudication before it.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)