Vitthal vs. The State Of Maharashtra
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Indira Banerjee
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
4 Jan 2019
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
9342/2019,9343/2019,9344/2019,9345/2019,10354/2019,10355/2019,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.14 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL)....... Diary No(s).23356/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-07-2011 in CRLA No.414/2010 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay At Aurangabad)
VITTHAL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing and refiling SLP, exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing O.T. and permission to file addl. documents/facts/annexures)
Date : 01-04-2019 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. V. Shekhar,Sr.Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri,AOR | ||
| Mr. Shashank Shekhar,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Shakti Pandey,Adv. | ||
| Mr. Prithviraj Singh,Adv. | ||
| Ms. Sheetal Rajput,Adv. |
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
In compliance of the order of this Court, the Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner has filed the additional affidavit dated 12.3.2019. We have perused the affidavit. We are troubled by the fact that it took one year for the Screening Committee of the Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee (SCLSC) to opine to file the special leave petition. Thus, this aspect needs some attention at the Digitally signed by SARITA PUROHIT Date: 2019.04.03 17:01:49 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
hand of the SCLSC. A copy of the order be sent to SCLSC. The petition was resubmitted to the SCLSC.
In view of the facts set out, delay in filing and refiling the special leave petition is condoned.
We do not find any merit in this petition. the special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Pending applications stand disposed of.
(Anita Rani Ahuja) (Sarita Purohit) Branch Officer AR-cum-PS