Srinivas Rao vs. R. Nagesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Not Reached / Adjourned
Before:
Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi, Hon'ble Satish Chandra Sharma
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
21 Nov 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.46 COURT NO.17 SECTION XVII-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.14908/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-07-2022 in FA No. 678/2021 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi)
SRINIVAS RAO Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
R. NAGESH & ANR. Respondent(s)
Date : 21-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
For Petitioner(s)
| Mr. Seshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv. | |
|---|---|
| Mr. Sateesh Galla, Adv. | |
| Mr. C. Raghavendren, Adv. | |
| Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Adv. | |
| Ch. Leela Sarveswar, Adv. | |
| Mr. Somanatha Padhan, AOR | |
| For Respondent(s) | |
| Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria, AOR | |
| Mr. Sharan Tadahal, Adv. | |
| Mr. Bikram Singh Patel, Adv. | |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. Vide order dated 16-9-2022, the notice was issued by this Court only for the purpose of exploring the possibility of settlement.
3. Today, learned counsel for the parties have stated that the matter has not been settled. Signature Not Verified
4. In view of the same, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi. Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date: 2023.11.23 20:09:28 IST Reason:
5. At this juncture, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner seeks some time to make payment of the dues pursuant to the order passed by the State Commission as confirmed by the NCDRC, and prays to permit the petitioner to make payment by 12 equal installments, to which Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria, learned Advocate-on-Record appearing for Respondent No.1 has no objection.
6. In view of the consent given by Respondent No.1, it is directed that the petitioner shall make payment of the entire dues, pursuant to the order passed by the State Commission, as affirmed by National Commission in one year by 12 equal installments, and shall make payment of the entire dues by 30-11-2024. It is further directed that if the petitioner makes default in making payment consecutively for 2 months, it shall be open for the Respondent No.1 to execute the impugned order in accordance with law 7. Subject to the said direction, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
(VISHAL ANAND) (MAMTA RAWAT) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)