Sudhakar Pandey vs. Union Of India

COURT NO.4

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No.4005/2023

CHANDER SHEKHAR CHAURASIA

Appellant( $s$ )

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Respondent $(s)$

[ONLY IA NO. 58315/2025 IN CA NO. 4045/2023 IS LISTED UNDER THIS ITEM]

WITH

C.A. No. 4045/2023 (XVII) IA No. 58315/2025 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS

Date: 21-03-2025 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

For Appellant(s): Mr. B H Marlapalle, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sharad Chauhan, AOR Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ajit Wagh, Adv. Mr. Ashish Chaubey, Adv. Mr. Avinish Kumar Saurabh, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Srivastava, Adv.

Mr. Abhinav Anand, Adv.

Mr. Mayank Pandey, AOR

Mr. Subramaniam S., Adv.

Mr. Ashish Kumar Pandey, Adv.

Mr. Arun, Adv.

For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mayuri Raghuvanshi, AOR

Mr. Manish Tiwari, AOR Mr. Abhishek Kumar Chaubey, Adv. Mr. Rk Tanwar, Adv. Mr. Vinay Pratap Singh, Adv. Ms. Anushree Bhardwaj, Adv.

Mr. Vishnu Shankar Jain, AOR Ms. Mani Munjal, Adv. Mr. Parth Yadav, Adv. Mr. Shourya Krishna, Adv.

Mr. Pradeep Misra, AOR Mr. Daleep Dhyani, Adv. Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

IA NO. 58315/2025 in CA NO. 4045/2023

According to the case of the applicant though there is no restraint on mining, someone is preventing the applicant from mining. If that be so, appropriate remedy has to be adopted by the applicant.

The application is rejected subject to reserving the remedy.

(KAVITA PAHUJA) (AVGV RAMU) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)