Veerappa Reddy vs. Ambujakshi

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Registrar (Court)
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:22 Mar 2024
CNR:SCIN010232642023

AI Summary

This Supreme Court order in a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) directs the respondent parties to file their counter-affidavits within four weeks, with the petitioner granted two weeks thereafter to file a rejoinder. The case, challenging a High Court order from Karnataka, has been listed for further hearing, indicating ongoing proceedings in a criminal matter. This is a crucial procedural step towards the substantive hearing of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi:
A procedural order directing the filing of affidavits and scheduling future hearings does not contain a ratio decidendi on substantive legal issues, as its purpose is to manage the progress of the case, not to pronounce on the merits of the dispute.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:10695/2023
Case Type:Special Leave Petition (Crl.)
Case Sub-Type:SLP - Criminal Matter
Order Date:2024-03-22
Filing Year:2023
Court:SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Bench:Division Bench
Judges:Hon'ble Vikram Nath, Hon'ble Satish Chandra Sharma

Petitioner's Counsel

Shanth V. Mahale
Advocate - Appeared
Rajesh Mahale
AOR - Appeared

Respondent's Counsel

Saket Gogia
Advocate - Appeared
Gauri Pande
Advocate - Appeared
Sheetal Maggon
Advocate - Appeared
Mansingh
Advocate - Appeared
Dhawesh Pahuja
AOR - Appeared
V. N. Raghupathy
AOR - Appeared
Manendra Pal Gupta
Advocate - Appeared
Prakash Jadhav
Advocate - Appeared
Ravichandra Jadhav
Advocate - Appeared
Md. Apzal Ansari
Advocate - Appeared
S. Shashank Reddy
Advocate - Appeared
Vinod Kumar Srivastava
Advocate - Appeared
Dhanesh Ieshdhan
Advocate - Appeared

Advocates on Record

Rajesh Mahale
Dhawesh Pahuja
V. N. Raghupathy

eCourtsIndia AITM

Brief Facts Summary

This order concerns Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 10695/2023, filed by Veerappa Reddy against Ambujakshi & Ors., challenging a final judgment and order dated February 1, 2023, passed by the High Court of Karnataka in CRLP No. 2882/2019. On March 22, 2024, the Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, directed respondent nos. 1 to 6 to file their counter-affidavit within four weeks, followed by the petitioner's rejoinder within two weeks. The matter has been listed for further hearing after six weeks.

Timeline of Events

2019

Criminal Petition (CRLP No. 2882/2019) filed in High Court of Karnataka.

2023-02-01

High Court of Karnataka passed final judgment and order in CRLP No. 2882/2019.

2023

Veerappa Reddy filed Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 10695/2023 in the Supreme Court.

2024-03-22

Supreme Court directed respondents to file counter affidavit and petitioner to file rejoinder, listing the matter after six weeks.

Court's Reasoning

The court's reasoning for this order is purely procedural, aiming to facilitate the orderly progress of the case. By granting specific timelines for filing a counter-affidavit by the respondents and a rejoinder affidavit by the petitioner, the court ensures that all necessary written submissions are on record before the matter proceeds to a substantive hearing or decision on admission.

Judicial Philosophy Indicators:
  • Strict Adherence to Procedure
  • Ensuring Fair Opportunity to Parties
Order Nature:Procedural
Disposition Status:Pending

Impugned Orders

High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru
Case: CRLP No. 2882/2019
Date: 2023-02-01

Specific Directions

  1. 1.Four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 6 to file counter affidavit.
  2. 2.Thereafter, two weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit, if any.
  3. 3.List the matter after six weeks.

Precedential Assessment

Non-Binding (Procedural)

This is a purely procedural order granting time for filing affidavits and scheduling the next hearing. It does not lay down any legal principles or substantive rulings, thus having no precedential value.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Timely filing of counter-affidavits and rejoinders is crucial as per court directions to avoid delays or adverse orders in ongoing litigation.
2.Legal professionals must meticulously track and comply with all procedural timelines specified by the Supreme Court to ensure the smooth progress of their cases.
3.Interlocutory Applications (IAs) like exemption from filing O.T. are common in SLPs and should be addressed promptly to prevent procedural hurdles.

Legal Tags

Special Leave Petition criminal procedural directionsCounter affidavit filing Supreme Court criminal caseRejoinder affidavit timelines Supreme Court practiceAdjournment of criminal special leave petitionSupreme Court interlocutory application exemption filingHigh Court Karnataka criminal judgment challengeBench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Satish Chandra SharmaSupreme Court practice and procedure criminal mattersPreparing criminal appeals for final hearing Supreme CourtTimeline management in Supreme Court criminal appeals

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Next Week / Week Commencing / C.O.Week

Before:

Hon'ble Vikram Nath, Hon'ble Satish Chandra Sharma

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES

Remarks:

List After (Weeks) [6]

Listed On:

22 Mar 2024

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

172395/2023,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.37 COURT NO.9 SECTION II-C

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 10695/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-02-2023 in CRLP No. 2882/2019 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru)

VEERAPPA REDDY Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

AMBUJAKSHI & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No. 172395/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Date : 22-03-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

For Petitioner(s)Mr. Shanth V. Mahale,Adv.<br>Mr. Rajesh Mahale, AOR
For Respondent(s)Mr. Saket Gogia, Adv.<br>Ms. Gauri Pande, Adv.<br>Ms. Sheetal Maggon, Adv.<br>Mr. Mansingh, Adv.<br>Mr. Dhawesh Pahuja, AOR
Mr. V. N. Raghupathy, AOR<br>Mr. Manendra Pal Gupta, Adv.<br>Mr. Prakash Jadhav, Adv.<br>Mr. Ravichandra Jadhav, Adv.<br>Mr. Md. Apzal Ansari, Adv.<br>Mr. S. Shashank Reddy, Adv.<br>Mr. Vinod Kumar Srivastava, Adv.<br>Mr. Dhanesh Ieshdhan, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

As prayed, four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 6 to file counter affidavit. Thereafter, two weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit, if any.

List the matter after six weeks.

(NEETU KHAJURIA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS (RANJANA SHAILEY) COURT MASTER

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(7) - 11 Jul 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 6 May 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 22 Mar 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(4) - 25 Jan 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 7 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 1 Nov 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 1 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search