Veerappa Reddy vs. Ambujakshi
AI Summary
In a significant development, the Supreme Court has issued notice in a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) filed by Veerappa Reddy, challenging a High Court order. This means the apex court will now delve deeper into the matter, requiring responses from Ambujakshi and other respondents, setting the stage for further legal proceedings in this criminal dispute.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Advocates on Record
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
Veerappa Reddy filed a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) against a final judgment and order dated February 1, 2023, issued by the High Court of Karnataka in CRLP No. 2882/2019. On September 1, 2023, the Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah, heard the petition and directed the issuance of notice to the respondents, returnable within six weeks.
Timeline of Events
Criminal Petition (CRLP No. 2882/2019) filed in High Court of Karnataka.
High Court of Karnataka passed final judgment and order in CRLP No. 2882/2019.
Special Leave Petition (Criminal) filed in Supreme Court of India by Veerappa Reddy.
Supreme Court heard the SLP (Crl.) and issued notice to the respondents.
Primary Legal Issues
Secondary Legal Issues
Petitioner's Arguments
The petitioner, Veerappa Reddy, presented arguments seeking leave to appeal the High Court's criminal judgment, likely highlighting alleged errors in law or fact that warrant Supreme Court intervention. (Details of specific arguments not available in this procedural order.)
Respondent's Arguments
No arguments were presented by the respondent side at this stage, as notice has just been issued.
Court's Reasoning
The Supreme Court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel, found sufficient prima facie grounds to admit the Special Leave Petition for further consideration, hence issuing notice to the respondents. This indicates that the court believes there is a arguable point or a potential miscarriage of justice that needs to be addressed.
- Emphasis on Natural Justice (by providing an opportunity to the respondents to present their case)
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.Issue notice, returnable within six weeks.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This order is procedural, merely directing issuance of notice, and does not contain any substantive legal pronouncements or interpretations that would establish precedent.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
1 Sept 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 10695/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-02-2023 in CRLP No. 2882/2019 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka at Bengaluru)
VEERAPPA REDDY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
AMBUJAKSHI & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.172395/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )
Date : 01-09-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shantha Kumar V. Mahale, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Mahale, AOR Mr. Abdul Rahiman, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Issue notice, returnable within six weeks.
(NEETU KHAJURIA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS
(RANJANA SHAILEY) COURT MASTER
