All India Judges Association vs. Union Of India

REVISED

REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION X

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 643/2015

ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and office report)

Date : 25/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Ms. Mayuri Raghuvanshi,Adv.

• For Respondent(s) Mr. Avanish Rathi,Adv. Mr. Apoorv Kurup,Adv.
• Ms. Archana Singh,Adv. Mr. Abhisth Kumar,Adv.

Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee,Adv. Ms. Ankita Chadha,Adv.

Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv.

Mr. A. Radhakrishnan,Adv.

Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei,Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv.

Digitally signed by Madhu Grover Date: 2016.04.27 16:22:02 SCT Ms. Vidushi Garg,Adv.

Signature Not Verified

Reason:

Mr. Bharat Sangal,Adv.

Mr. B. V. Balaram Das,Adv.

Item No.25 2

Mr. Sandeepan Pathak,Adv. Mr. C. D. Singh,Adv.

 Mr. Devendra Singh,Adv.
 Mr. Harish Kumar Khinchi,Adv.
 Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv.
 Mr. Y. Lokesh,Adv.
 Mr. Krishnanand Pandeya,Adv.
 Ms. Maitrayee Banerjee,Adv.
 Mr. Kunal Chatterji,Adv.
 Mr. Mukesh K. Giri,Adv.
 Ms. Kanika Singh,Adv.
 Mr. Mukul Kumar,Adv.
 Mr. Ashutosh G.,Adv.
 Mr. Marsook Bafaki,Adv.
 Mr. Nikhil Goel,Adv.
 Mr. Nikhil Nayyar,Adv.
 Mr. P. I. Jose,Adv.
 Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee,Adv.
 Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra,Adv.
 Mr. Sudhanshu S. Choudhari,Adv.
 Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma,Adv.
 Mr. Prabu Ramasubramanian,Adv.
 Mr. V. G. Pragasam,Adv.
 Mr. V. N. Raghupathy,Adv.
Item No.25 3
 M/s Arputham Aruna & Co.,Adv.
 Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran,Adv.
 Ms. G. Indira,Adv.
 Ms. Hemantika Wahi,Adv.
 Mr. Edward Belho,Adv.
 Ms. K. Enatoli Sema,Adv.
 Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv.
 Ms. Preetika Dwivedi,Adv.
 Ms. Monika,Adv.
 Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Sharma,Adv.
 Ms. Rachana Srivastava,Adv.

Mr. S.S. Shamshery,Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli,Adv.

Ms. Sneha Kalita,Adv.

Mr. T.A. Khan,Adv. Mr. B.K. Prasad,Adv.

Mr. Suryanaryana Singh,Adv. Ms. Pragati Neekhra,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Respondent Nos.6,19,21,30,40,52, 66 and 67 have already filed the counter affidavit. Other appearing respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.

Service of notice is complete on the remaining respondents but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

MG