Birla Corporation Limited Managing Director vs. Bhanwar Singh& Ors.

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:1 Mar 2013
CNR:SCIN010231322012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

18 Jul 2012

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.60 COURT NO.2 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).21211/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 25/05/2012 in DBCWP No.6591/2011 of The HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR) BIRLA CORPN.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS WITH SLP(C) NO. 22377 of 2012 report) SLP(C) NO. 23551 of 2012 SLP(C) NO. 29698 of 2012 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 25186 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 26197 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 18/01/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish Salve, Sr. Adv.

For Petitioner(s)Mr. Harish Salve, Sr. Adv.
In SLP 21211/12 &Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.
rr. in SLPs.22377,Mr. P.H. Parekh, Sr. Adv.
23551,29698,25186 &Mr. E.R. Kumar, Adv.
26197/12Mr. Ankur Chawla, Adv.
Mr. U. Prasad, Adv.
Mr.Galav Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Kshatershal, Adv.
for M/s. Paresh & Co., Advs.
2/-

BHANWAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for directions,permission to file synopsis and list of dates and prayer for interim relief and office report)

(With appln. for directions and with prayer for interim relief and office

(With prayer for interim relief and office report)

  • : 2 : In SLP 22377/12 Mr. K.V. Viswanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Abhishek, Adv. Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin, Adv.
  • In SLP 23551/12 Mr. S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, Adv. M. Sunaina Kumar, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv.

In SLP 26197/12 & Dr. Manish Singhvi, AAG rr. In SLPs.21211/12 Mr. Amit Lubhaya, Adv. Mr. Irshad Ahmad, Adv.

In SLP 29698/12 & Ms. Liz Mathew, Adv. rr. in SLPs.21211/12 Mr. Giri Raj Subramanium, Adv. Ms. Sana Hashmi, Adv. Mr. Philip Mathew, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,Adv. Mr. Amit Verma, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Saini, Adv. Mr. Karmendar, Adv.

Mr. K.B. Rohtagi ,Adv Ms. Aparna Rohatgi Jain, Adv. Mr. Mahesh kasana, Adv.

Mr. Annam D.N. Rao ,Adv

Ms. Pragti Neekhra, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

On the question of interim orders, we have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondents at some length.

It is evident from the impugned order that the main issue before the High Court pertained to the impact of blasting operations in the periphery of

..3/-

: 3 :

Chittorgarh fort. Hence, the question of a complete ban on mining operations around the fort, even without involving blasting, has not been examined.

The parties are ad idem that before making final orders on the prayer for stay of the impugned directions, a report from an expert on the subject matter be called for. It is suggested that in the first instance, the Central Building Research Institute, Roorke, may be asked to conduct a study of impact of mining on the said fort even without blasting operations and submit its interim report. In other words, an expert should evaluate the effect of mining in the fort area, with any kind of mannual or electric gadgets, like surface scrappers, rock breakers, etc.

We accede to the prayer and accordingly request the Director of the Said Institute to nominate an expert to undertake the said exercise and submit his report as expeditiously as possible. In any case, interim report shall be submitted within three weeks from today. It will be open to the said expert to consult or seek assistance of any other agency, as he may deem necessary. It is agreed that all the expenses ..4/-

: 4 :

in this regard shall be borne by M/s Birla Corporation Ltd. The Secretarial assistance shall, however, be provided by the State.

In the meanwhile, the petitioners are permitted to carry out mining operations manually, without the use of any kind of heavy equipment like the JCBs, Earth movers etc. As the said fort is a protected monument, the ASI shall closely monitor the mining operations.

Call after four weeks.

| [ Charanjeet Kaur ] | | [ Kusum Gulati ] | |Court Master | |Court Master |

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(70) - 8 Apr 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(69) - 12 Nov 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(68) - 9 Jul 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(66) - 12 Jan 2024

Judgement - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(67) - 12 Jan 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(65) - 5 Dec 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(64) - 17 Oct 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(63) - 10 Oct 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(62) - 25 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(61) - 19 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(60) - 12 Jan 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(59) - 22 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(58) - 15 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(57) - 23 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(56) - 6 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(54) - 3 Apr 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(55) - 3 Apr 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(51) - 20 Mar 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(52) - 20 Mar 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(53) - 20 Mar 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(48) - 13 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(49) - 13 Feb 2017

Office Report

Click to view

Order(50) - 13 Feb 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(44) - 11 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(45) - 11 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(46) - 11 Jan 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(47) - 11 Jan 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(42) - 16 Nov 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(43) - 16 Nov 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(40) - 12 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(41) - 12 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 12 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 14 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(37) - 14 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(34) - 1 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(35) - 1 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 16 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 16 Dec 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 21 Apr 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 21 Apr 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(28) - 7 Apr 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 7 Apr 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 31 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(27) - 31 Mar 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 5 Jan 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 5 Jan 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 24 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 13 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 13 Oct 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 31 Mar 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 30 Sept 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 23 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 26 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 29 Jul 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 12 Jul 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 2 Jul 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 3 May 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 8 Mar 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 1 Mar 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(10) - 18 Jan 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 14 Dec 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 8 Nov 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 18 Oct 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 28 Sept 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 21 Sept 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 7 Sept 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 24 Aug 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 9 Aug 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 20 Jul 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data