C. Balakrishnan vs. Arulmighu Vishwanathaswamy Temple
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Hon'ble Vineet Saran
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed on ground of delay
Listed On:
21 May 2020
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Virtual Court No.1 ITEM NO.4
SECTION XII
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 23089/2019
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-01-2016 in SA No. 71/2008 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Madras)
C. BALAKRISHNAN & ANR.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ARULMIGHU VISHWANATHASWAMY TEMPLE
Respondent $(s)$
( IA No.41802/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.41804/2020-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.41806/2020-SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT and IA No.41807/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.41805/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. and IA No.41809/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS )
Date: 21-05-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'RIF MR. JUSTICE VINFFT SARAN
For Petitioner(s)
Mrs. Geetha Kovilan, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned.
$^{\text{\tiny{fred}}}$ Applications for substitution and setting aside abatement are lowed.
There is delay of 1185 days in filing this petition and the explanation offered in the application seeking condonation thereof is far from being satisfactory. We therefore, refuse to condone the delay. Consequently the Special Leave Petition is dismissed on the ground of delay.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
(INDU MARWAH) (JAGDISH CHANDER)