The State Of Haryana vs. Anil Kumar
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble Ajay Rastogi, Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi
Stage:
DIRECTION MATTERS
Remarks:
Not taken up/ Not Today
Listed On:
28 Mar 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
86764/2018,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.1729 COURT NO.6 SECTION IV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal Nos. 5947-5948/2022
HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
DEEPAK AGGARWAL & ORS. Respondent(s)
(( ONLY C.A. NO. 6047/2022 TO BE LISTED BEFORE HON. JUDGE IN CHAMBER ) )
WITH
C.A. No. 6047/2022 (IV)
(IA No. 243149/2023 - APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT IA No. 105958/2023 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 105959/2023 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN. IA No. 180504/2023 - SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT)
Date : 14-12-2023 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH [IN CHAMBERS]
For Appellant(s) | Mr. Alok Sangwan, Sr. A.A.G. |
---|---|
Mr. B.K. Satija, A.A.G. | |
Mr. Ajay Bansal, A.A.G. | |
Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. | |
Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv. | |
Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR | |
Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. | |
Mr. Gaurav Yadava, Adv. | |
Ms. Veena Bansal, Adv. | |
Mr. Rajat Sangwan, Adv. | |
Mr. Keshav Mittal, Adv. | |
Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. | |
Mr. B. K. Satija, AOR | |
For Respondent(s) | Mr. Ankit Swarup, AOR |
Ms. Apoorva Singh, Adv. | |
Mr. Rishi Bhargava, Adv. | |
Mr. Pushkar Singh Kanwal, Adv. |
Mr. Siddharth Batra, AOR Ms. Archna Yadav, Adv. Mr. Chinmay Dubey, Adv. Ms. Shivani Chawla, Adv. Mr. Rhythm Katyal, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Chugh, Adv. Mr. Pratyush Arora, Adv. Mr. B. K. Satija, A.A.G. Mr. Alok Sangwan, Sr. A.A.G. Mr. Ajay Bansal, A.A.G. Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv. Mr. Samar Vijay Singh, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
C.A. No. 6047/2022
Learned counsel for the applicant(s)(I.A. No. 105958/2023) prays for an adjournment to assist the Court as to how this application for substitution would be permissible especially in the light of the fact that the respondents had expired prior to even the passing of the order by the High Court.
List after four weeks.
(SNEHA DAS) (VIDYA NEGI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR