Xyz vs. The State Of Maharashtra
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
21 Aug 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
COURT NO.3
SECTION II-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 22957/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-08-2022 in CRLA(APL) No. 187/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay At Nagpur)
$XY7$
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
$Respondent(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.155920/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.155922/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.155921/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No.155923/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )
Date: 21-08-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Yogesh Subhash Kolte, AOR Ms. Varsha Sawant, Adv. Mr. Salil V Dabke, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following $\n\mathbf{R}\n$ DFR
Delay condoned.
During the course of hearing, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has drawn our attention to page no. 96 of ************************************ 18:06:43<mark>15</mark> bmission(s) relate to the disputed facts which cannot $be$ adjudicated at this stage.
The petitioner will be entitled to file an application for suppression of identity. If any such application is filed, the same would be considered in accordance with law.
Recording the aforesaid, the special leave petition is dismissed without making any comments on the merits of the case,
(BABITA PANDEY) (R.S. NARAYANAN) COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR