Gurupadappa (Now Died) Thr Lrs vs. Santosh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
1 Sept 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.25
COURT NO.16
SECTION IV-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO.17663/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-04-2023 in WP No. 101590/2023 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka Circuit Bench At Dharwad)
PANKAJ MALLIKARJUN BANAKAR
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SANTOSH & ORS.
Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION )
WITH SLP(C) No. 19375/2023 (IV-A)
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.163397/2023-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION $\mathbf{and}$ IA No.163399/2023-SETTING ASIDE $\mathbf{A}\mathbf{N}$ ABATEMENT and $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.163415/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.163413/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.163416/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No.163405/2023-APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT)
SLP(C) No. 19376/2023 (IV-A)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.171754/2023-APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.171755/2023-SETTING ASIDE AN ABATEMENT and IA No.171759/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.171760/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No.171757/2023-APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING THE APPLICATION FOR SETTING ASIDE THE ABATEMENT)
Date: 01-09-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Mahale, AOR Mr. Amit K. Nain, AOR
- M/S. S-legal Associates, AOR
- Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv.
- Mr. Sharanagouda Patil, Adv.
- Mr. Girish Gn, Adv.
- Ms. Pracheta Kar, Adv.
- Mr. Aditya Sidhra, Adv.
- Mr. Nadeem Afroz, Adv.
Mrs. Supreeta Patil, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil C Nishani, Adv. Mr. Parthiv Goswami, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rajivkumar, AOR Mr. Malikarjun Hukkeri, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
We find no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. However, in so far as the subsequent purchasers are concerned, it can be worked out in the final decree proceedings.
The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.
(KAVITA PAHUJA) (RAM SUBHAG SINGH) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)