Tara Balmiki vs. State Of Uttarakhand
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble J.M. Panchal
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:22 Oct 2010
CNR:SCIN010227062010
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
23 Jul 2010
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| FITEM NO.39 | COURT NO.13 | SECTION II |
|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E | C O U R T<br>O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A |
| Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).6960/2010 | ||
| (From the judgement and order dated 18/06/2010 in CRLA No.<br>312/1998 & CRLA No. 1373/2001 of The HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL<br>AT NAINITAL) | ||
| TARA BALMIKI | Petitioner(s) | |
| VERSUS | ||
| STATE OF UTTARAKHAND | Respondent(s) | |
| (With appln(s) for bail) | ||
| Date: 22/10/2010<br>This Petition was called on for hearing<br>today. | ||
| CORAM :<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. PANCHAL<br>HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA | ||
| For Petitioner(s)<br>Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr.<br>Mr. | Yunus Malik,Adv.<br>Ravi Kishore,Adv.<br>Samir Malik,Adv.<br>Prashant Chaudhary,Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia,Adv. | |
| UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R | ||
| Perused the letter.<br>Though in the letter, the learned counsel for the<br>respondent seeks four weeks' time to enable him to obtain<br>necessary instructions, this Court is of the opinion that<br>a week's time will be sufficient for the purpose.<br>List the matter beyond Diwali holidays. | ||
| (V.K. Tiwari)<br>P. A. | (Sneh Bala Mehra)<br>Court Master |
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search