Shri Nath Cargo Pvt. Ltd vs. Parag Sarees
AI Summary
The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by M/S Shri Nath Cargo Pvt. Ltd., upholding a Delhi High Court order. This decision highlights the Supreme Court's limited intervention under Article 136 when no substantial ground for interference is found, reinforcing the finality of lower court judgments in such scenarios.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Advocates on Record
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
M/S Shri Nath Cargo Pvt. Ltd. filed a Special Leave Petition (Civil) in the Supreme Court, challenging a final judgment and order dated April 17, 2014, passed by the High Court of Delhi in RSA No. 79/2014. The petition was heard on October 8, 2014, by a Division Bench of the Supreme Court.
Timeline of Events
High Court of Delhi passed final judgment and order in RSA No. 79/2014.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) filed in Supreme Court by M/S Shri Nath Cargo Pvt. Ltd.
Supreme Court heard the Special Leave Petition.
Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition.
Key Factual Findings
No ground for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
Source: Current Court Finding
Primary Legal Issues
Statutes Applied
Petitioner's Arguments
The learned counsel for the petitioner argued for intervention with the impugned High Court order, implicitly contending that the High Court's decision warranted review by the Supreme Court based on some error or special circumstance.
Court's Reasoning
The Court, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, concluded that no ground for interference was made out within its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. This implies that the High Court's reasoning or findings did not present any exceptional circumstances, manifest injustice, or significant legal errors that would necessitate the Supreme Court's intervention.
- Prudence in exercising extraordinary jurisdiction
- Respect for lower court decisions when no clear error
Impugned Orders
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This is a summary dismissal of an SLP without detailed reasoning on the merits, merely stating 'no ground for interference'. It reaffirms the established principle of Article 136 but does not lay down new law or offer novel interpretations, hence its precedential value is limited to a procedural affirmation.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
15 Sept 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.6 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 25847/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 17/04/2014 in RSA No. 79/2014 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At N. Delhi)
M/S SHRI NATH CARGO PVT. LTD Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S PARAG SAREES Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report)
Date : 08/10/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. S.K. Srivastva, Adv. Mr. Rajender Prasad,AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
No ground for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
The special leave petition is dismissed.
Court Master Assistant Registrar
(Parveen Kr. Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora)
